Another Media Blunder

Check out Blackfive.

Once again our media in a rush to be first or to simply report in their accustomed fashion did not get their facts straight. The suicide bombing in Iraq was not in the Green Zone.

First and foremost of all, I want to thank all of you who have rushed e-mails and calls to me to see that I am Ok, in light of the suicide bombing of the Iraqi Parliament cafeteria. It was most heartening.

For those of you who did not care enough to e-mail me, it’s OK, I’m all right.

Actually, depite the reporting I’ve heard from CNN, BBC and NPR, which keeps up the ominous drone of doom about the terrorists breaching the Parliament buliding in “the heart of the heavily fortified Green Zone,” the FACT is the Parliament buliding is NOT IN the Green Zone. We turned it over to the Iraqis in 2006. And when it was, it was at the outer NW edge of the Green or International Zone.

Of course, no one here especially expects the press, with its now, 4 year old biases to get it right. But that being said, I am beginning to believe there is something else going on here that this episode illustrates, which in an unfortunately perverse way, suggests deeper progresss.

The attack was carried out by Al Qaeda in Iraq (AQI), the Mesopotamian affiliate of bin Laden’s parent corporation. (Actually, it’s more like a cooperative) It was directed in the first instance against what it sees are Sunni Quislings, who advocate the apostacy of political integration in finding a political “solution” to this strife.

The AQI started doing that in Al Anbar a while ago, attacking tribal leaders who decided to try to leverage a political resolution into all kinds of advantages, some high-minded, many not. After a few moths of attacks on these indigenous tribes many of the tribal leaders havebegan turning vilently and relentlessly against AQI. they began turning them in, but usually just tracked them down and killed them…by the truckloads.

If that begins to happen in Baghdad we have a real paradigm shift.

[redacted] noted correctly the other day when the Shia were demonstarting in Najaf for the expelling of the Coalition “occupiers,” the most significant and perdominant visual was the crowds waving the Iraqi flag; not the green banner of Shia or the black martyrs’ flags. That act of nationalism, even though likely staged, had to resonante with a sizeable portion of the demonstartors. At least the leadership felt the need or advantage of doing that.

You’ll never get the press to talk about this in that way, but it’s probably a fairer indication of trends here.

As you can see, I’m still hopeful and confident that we can prevail here, or maybe I should say the Iraqis can prevail……no, it is we that must prevail.

It used to be the media in this country felt a responsibility to our citizens. Sometimes now I wonder.

Written by Sue

11 Responses to “Another Media Blunder”

  • bileduct:

    You might want to actually fact-check before swallowing hook, line and sinker the words of an ANONYMOUS SOURCE on an inconsequential blog.

    The Iraqi Parliament is housed within the Convention Center building, which itself is located well within the Green Zone. Don’t believe me?

    Link.

    Please fact-check, do not regurgitate.

    Thankyou.

  • ~J~:

    bileduct,

    I see no contradiction in the article. The reason is this quote pulled from it:

    Actually, depite the reporting I’ve heard from CNN, BBC and NPR, which keeps up the ominous drone of doom about the terrorists breaching the Parliament buliding in “the heart of the heavily fortified Green Zone,” the FACT is the Parliament buliding is NOT IN the Green Zone. We turned it over to the Iraqis in 2006. And when it was, it was at the outer NW edge of the Green or International Zone.

    How recent is your map?

  • bileduct:

    If you had bothered to check the map on the link provided you would have noticed that it is dated December 20, 2006.

    The Convention Center building housing the Iraqi Parliament is WELL WITHIN the Green Zone, as you will notice when you decide to have a look at the map.

    In the event that you want to dispute whether or not the Convention Center was the building that was bombed I have provided a further link identifying the Convention Center building as the location of the attack:

    http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=9533592

    Why don’t you sit back and have another hard look at this, taking into account the following FACTS:

    1) WORLDWIDE mainstream media outlets, including Fox News, reported that the blast had occurred within the Green Zone;
    2) The source providing information to the contrary is ANONYMOUS.

    You have been misled.

  • Sue:

    Bileduct:

    Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I had frankly forgotten about this post until I saw your comment this evening.

    I appreciate J defending the article as on the fact of it the underlined portion I believe to be true.

    However, my interpretation of it was not as you have correctly pointed out. The bombing did occur in the Green Zone and had I given afterthought to this post I would have corrected that fact.

    Thanks for the reminder that we need to think with our heads and not our hearts on all matters and I do apologize for the error.

  • ~J~:

    Bileduct,

    On this site we aim to be professional in the way we speak to others. We don’t question their intelligence or ability to read.

    I looked at the map and I looked for a date, but I could not find it.

    After you pointed out it was on there I went to the map again and saw it above the map and not where I had been looking before.

    I apologize for my error.

    Sue has apologized for her error.

    I await your apology for the way you spoke to both of us on this site.

  • Sue:

    Bileduct:

    While I have apologized, many news outlets were referring to the attack taking place at the Iraq Parliament Building. While I will not get into a war of links with you, the following is from a reputable news outlet. article)
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/12/AR2007041200265.html
    or this one:
    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,265487,00.html

    When I am incorrect, I have no difficulty admiting it and correcting the mistake but I do take exception with anyone who seems to deem themselves above error.

  • bileduct:

    Sue and J,

    I apologise for the tone of my remarks.

    Furthermore I congratulate you both for continuing to discuss this topic professionally.

  • Sue:

    Bileduct:

    Thank you.

    I will not speak for J but for myself as I said earlier, I will never hesitate to correct an error I have made if it is shown to me.

    Have a pleasant morning and wonderful day tomorrow.

  • ~J~:

    Bileduct,

    It takes a big man to apologize. Your apology is accepted and we hope you continue to read us. If you find anything wrong with what we have written feel free to point it out.

    G’day, Mate! Wink

  • Cal:

    Sue,Excellent discussion. You did your research and it turned out wrong like a lot of things in the fog of war. Nothing wrong with that.

  • ~J~:

    Sue,

    The bottom line (I’m a bottom line kind of person :”> ) is that when you wrote this post it was information coming from the field on a milblog. You did not intentionally make a mistake and I can tell you I’ve written posts that I later read were inaccurate but I haven’t looked up the original post to correct it.

    You didn’t commit a deliberate act of misleading. Your heart was in the right place and that’s what matters to me. You’ve apologized, bileduct and I have apologized and let’s move on.Mad

FACING UP TO THE
Nation's Finances
National Debt Clock
Categories