Admin

 

Verse of the Day

The Newsroom

Powered By
widgetmate.com
Sponsored By
Digital Camera


Site Design By: SC Themes


Proud to be Americans





Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Blogroll

Newspaper Rack

Categories

With the self-proclaimed base of the Republican party going bananas over illegal immigration and promising to not vote for someone who is not 100% as far right as they are on every issue, we now have the same thing happening to the self-proclaimed base of the Democratic party.

The bitter battle between the Democratic Congress and President Bush over Iraq war funding may be over for now, but another fight has erupted between Democrats and members of the antiwar base who say they were betrayed by their party.

Democratic leaders told their rank-and-file supporters Friday they had no choice but to give up efforts to tie a troop-withdrawal deadline to an emergency appropriations bill. Mr. Bush on Friday signed the bill that pays for U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan until the end of the fiscal year, Sept. 30.

Many antiwar activists and bloggers condemned the Democrats’ retreat and said their patience with party leadership was wearing thin.

“Today America watched a Democratic Party kick them square in the teeth — all in order to continue the most unpopular war in a generation,” Democratic campaign strategist David Sirota wrote Friday on the left-wing Huffington Post Web site. “We gave them our heart; they gave President Bush a blank check.

“That will make May 24, 2007, a dark day … when Democrats in Washington not only continued the war they promised to end, but happily went on record declaring that they believe in their hearts that government’s role is to ignore the will of the American people,” Mr. Sirota wrote.

The Daily Kos, one of the largest antiwar Web sites, also expressed disappointment and anger that leaders such as Democratic Sen. James H. Webb Jr. of Virginia voted to approve funding for the war. But it took some solace in Mr. Webb’s statement that he “will not relent from my continuing efforts to bring this occupation to an end.”

“They let us down this time. But the opportunities for them to make amends still exist,” Markos Moulitsas Zuniga, founder of the Daily Kos, wrote the day after the vote. “If Democrats take advantage of them, as they promise they will, then all might be forgiven. They can prove to us that they in fact know what they are doing, and that they, in fact, do plan on honoring their most sacred promise to the 2006 electorate.

“And if they don’t? Well, no one, not even the most rabid partisans, have an endless supply of patience,” Mr. Zuniga warned.

As I’ve said before, the problem with the extreme wings of both parties is their candidates have to be as pure as the driven snow when it comes to their issues. No compromise; no reality; just temper tantrums to get what they want.

So, with the election about 17 months away, what will these purists do if they don’t get their way? Besides suck their thumbs and sulk?

They can’t vote for anyone in good conscience because no one measures up, so do they stay home to punish the party?

Maybe that’s not such a bad idea because then we could elect someone who is reasonable and not ready to fall off a cliff on the right or the left.

Written by ~J~

One Response to “What if We Held an Election and Nobody Came?”


  1. Sue Says:


    Visit Sue

    I used to love politics but as of late it seem a though one story is a repeat of another. You are so correct that the fringes seem to be all the news of the day and it is clear they do not have the interest of the people at heart.

    These groups and individuals have simply hijacked our system which is repulsive.

    On the Republican side, the voters may once again stay home..they did it once already but on the Democratic side, while they may threaten my guess is they will show up as they know they have a real chance to capture the White House and both houses of Congress.