Admin

 

Verse of the Day

The Newsroom

Powered By
widgetmate.com
Sponsored By
Digital Camera


Site Design By: SC Themes


Proud to be Americans





Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Blogroll

Newspaper Rack

Categories

Christianity has been under attack since the very beginning. There’s nothing bold or shocking about that statement. When the “lost” Gospel of Judas was published to much fanfare early this year, I sighed. I thought, “Here we go again.”

This “lost” gospel was never lost. It was thrown away, as astute critics of the new publication and accompanying National Geographic TV specials have said. The Gospel of Judas, like the similar gospels of Thomas, Peter, Mary Magdalene, etc., are all Gnostic tracts. Gnosticism was—is—an offshoot of Christianity that is hard to define precisely, as there have been various sects, but they all deny the deity of Christ and His oneness with the Father. All of them were never accepted as inspired scripture because they describe Christ in terms that fly in the face of the rest of scripture. Judas is particularly odious because it makes many villains in the Bible out to be a misunderstood heroes, including the first murderer, Cain.

Gnosticism, in its various forms, treats flesh as evil and the spirit world as supreme, so to them, Christ could never be the Word become flesh—which directly contradicts the rest of scripture.

Many scholars and journalists hailed the “lost” Gospel of Judas as a new interpretation of Christ, and said it raised a whole new set of questions.

No, it didn’t. It dredged up old questions and issues that had been successfully slapped down by lions for the faith in the first, second and third centuries.

You may ask, “what’s the harm?” There is serious harm for Christians who are new to the faith and don’t know what scripture really says about Christ. There is serious harm if apostates—snakes who claim to be Christian but really aren’t—teach Gnosticism as if it were accepted Christianity.

Christians are called by God to “contend earnestly for the faith” (see the letter of St. Jude), which means that we are to fight for the truth of who Christ is. That does not mean, and never means, fight with bombs and fists and guns, but with words and by actually speaking out. By remaining silent in the face of Gnosticism because we’re afraid of what others say, we are not contending earnestly for the faith—but hiding.

But even these outside attacks on the faith are nowhere near as damaging as the internal attacks on the faith. I’ll write more on Jude next time. Thanks for reading, and thanks again to ~J~ for letting me post these thoughts.

– Truman

Written by Truman

3 Responses to “The Gospel of Judas was never “lost””


  1. ~J~ Says:


    Visit ~J~

    I love your posts, Truman, and you are doing us the honor!

    Isn’t it amazing how the Holy Spirit gave discernment to those scholars who put the greatest Book together?

    Why would I want to read a book written by the man who betrayed Christ and was a false disciple probably all along? He was a good tool of the devil and in the end had to hang himself for what he did.


  2. Ayschlay Says:


    Visit Ayschlay

    I don’t think Gnosticism was an offshoot of Christianity. It pre-dated Christianity and later influenced some Christians.

    Here are two on-line references on this topic, the Theology Website and The Dictionary of the History of Ideas.

    I guess there’s also some debate among theologians and historians whether its right to use the 17th century term Gnostic as a label for ancient writings because it lumps together works that are quite different. See reviews of Michael Williams’ 1996 book, An Argument for Dismantling a Dubious Category. See also the definition of Gnostic in the Oxford English Dictionary.


  3. Truman Says:


    Visit Truman

    Ayschlay, thank you for pointing out my historical errors. Gnostic thought did influence some Christians, which is why it was so dangerous, as it unfortunately lead many believers astray.