Admin

 

Verse of the Day

The Newsroom

Powered By
widgetmate.com
Sponsored By
Digital Camera


Site Design By: SC Themes


Proud to be Americans





Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Blogroll

Newspaper Rack

Categories

According to this piece at Patterico’s Pontifications
Johnny Sutton may be answering some tough questions today.

Today, the Senate Judiciary Committee has scheduled a hearing to examine the prosecution of Agents Ramos and Compean. Johnny Sutton, the U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Texas whose office prosecuted the Ramos/Compean case, is scheduled to testify at the hearing.

I hope Mr. Sutton’s testimony at this hearing helps answer my questions and concerns about the Ramos/Compean trial and verdict. In an effort to clarify my questions and concerns and to facilitate a better understanding of the testimony tendered to the Committee, this post will compare the Ramos/Compean trial transcript with the U.S. Attorney’s most recent press release.

If you are unfamiliar with the Ramos/Compean case or need a refresher on the facts, this February 2007 article by the AP’s Pauline Arrillaga (Washington Post link) contains a concise summary.

The linked post has terrific information on the case itself and should you wish to read further there is more here.

Update: Here is the Official Hearing Notice/Witness list as provided by the Judiciary Committee.

Written by Sue

3 Responses to “Johnny on the hot seat”


  1. ~J~ Says:


    Visit ~J~

    It’s about time and this is one investigation I want to see go full bore. Here is a United States Attorney who needs to be fired and those agents need to be pardoned and their records expunged.


  2. Matt Says:


    Visit Matt

    Nice blog. Johnny ‘Nifong’ Sutton wanted to send a message to border agents on Bush’s behalf which was “let the invasion continue”. Hopefully Sutton will end up in jail and become an example message to other rogue prosecutors, “Don’t be a dick and just follow the law”.


  3. Sue Says:


    Visit Sue

    Matt:

    Thanks for visiting and for commenting.

    Won’t it be interesting if these hearings produce something which did not come out at trial or which was contradicted?

    We’ll see.