It’s time to call a spade a spade in a headline and I’m doing it the best way I can.

I’m going to give you a partial quote from this article, which I haven’t read yet and probably will not:

While Washington is mired in political debate over the future of Iraq, the American command here has prepared a detailed plan that foresees a significant American role for the next two years.

The classified plan, which represents the coordinated strategy of the top American commander and the American ambassador,

Classified plan. How stupid is the Times to not realize a classified plan is not for public consumption? How traitorous is it for the unnamed sources to leak this information to that rag of a paper?

When is the justice department going to investigate who made the leak, find two witnesses (the writer of the Times and the editor should be two) and prosecute the leaker for treason? Since everyone is reading the Times article, finding two witnesses to that shouldn’t be a problem and they should be brought up on treason charges too.

Sure, all the liberals and all the newspapers will cry foul, but when our national secrets are at stake let them cry all they want. The truth of the matter is they have broken laws and betrayed the secrets of the United States so they can sell newspapers and some scumbag is feeding them the information.

A couple of sentences for treason might stop this from happening.