Some Details On Hsu’s Discovery
Sue may have written about this already and I apologize for reposting the same information if she has.
That night, passengers on in the sleeper compartment across the aisle from his noticed a hat, a book and other items spilling into the hallway from under the door. The next morning, the drapes were still drawn. Returning from breakfast, one passenger peeked through the curtains and saw a person wedged against the door. The passenger, Joanne Segale, a retired school-bus driver from Sonora, Calif., knocked on the window but got no answer. Segale said she saw a man who appeared to be in fetal position, bare-chested. “It appeared this person had fallen out of bed,” she said.
Eventually, three conductors used the crowbar to pry the door open.
Segale said that Hsu “could not stand. He was acting like he didn’t understand them. They tried to get him up but he couldn’t walk.” At one point, Hsu asked the Amtrak attendants if he was in jail, according to Segale.
When Hsu was helped to the bathroom, Segale says she saw “lots and lots of medication in that room. I could see pills on the floor and rolling around.”
Giving back the money in drips and drops isn’t going to take this story away. The press and the bloggers smell blood in the water and will search it out.
The money from the Clinton campaign is going back to the donors, who were suspicious characters to begin with, so who is really getting the money? Who is behind this meddling in our political affairs?
How did Norman Hsu get the money he gave and how did the people he got to contribute honestly get the money? I say honestly because I strongly suspect the people involved are agents of the Chinese government.
Just as we sold our military secrets to the Chi-Coms in the 90s for political donations from Buddhist monks and other crooked “businessmen”, I wonder why they are so interested in making sure Hillary is president and lots of other Democrats are elected or re-elected.
The voters need to be reminded of this over and over again until it sinks in that if we put in Sen. Clinton we are going to have to endure another four or eight years of corruption at the very highest levels.
The first dribble of money went to “charity”. The question is: what is the charity so it can be confirmed? For all I know the charity is the DNC.
This fish is beginning to stink more and more with each passing day.
Written by ~J~
Sue Says:
September 11th, 2007 at 11:32 amVisit Sue
Drip, drip, drip.
No I didn’t post this piece but I am glad you did. We do need to get to the bottom of this to make sure our next President is not bought and paid for by Chinese money.
Guss Says:
September 11th, 2007 at 6:24 pmVisit Guss
Sue Says:
September 11th, 2007 at 9:30 pmVisit Sue
Guss:
It is a shame in my mind that you find humor in one of the most important decisions we all will make next November. And yes, this is about that decision.
I don’t care about scandals which involve a person’s personal life, those are between them and their family. I did not care about Monica Lewinsky other than the fact that a President would use the Oval Office for such activities. I did care that we had a President who perjured himself in front of a grand jury .
Further, the influx of Chinese money to the democrats over the years and yes, that included Bill Clinton’s run in 1996
is enough to make me keep a close eye on this story. The WaPo, LAT and the NYT which are favorites of the left to quote are the ones keeping this story alive as are many who are digging deep to find the answers to this latest campaign activity. The FBI is doing a full investigation of these bundled contributions..I don’t think they got involved on a whim.
You think as you wish but this story is one which needs to be clarified in some manner and it deserves to be reported until it is.
Further, I think you would be surprised how many people are reading and commenting on this not only on right wing blogs but at the newspaper blogs and news site comment section.
You may not find this a topic of interest, but I must say, I have commented at many sites and have never seen anyone put up a comment that mocks the poster. Not to say that a civil discussion does not include both sides but to simply imply with laughter that any poster or their piece is a joke is something which would not be tolerated in many places. It would be met with a rebuke at many sites and a possible banning at others. Do as you wish. I most certainly will not debate this issue with you.