Admin

 

September 2007
M T W T F S S
« Aug   Oct »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Verse of the Day

The Newsroom

Powered By
widgetmate.com
Sponsored By
Digital Camera


Site Design By: SC Themes


Proud to be Americans





Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Blogroll

Newspaper Rack

Categories

Personally, I hope so. All this nonsense about disenfranchising certain voters and this being about the color of someone’s skin has gone far beyond sensibility.

When the United States Supreme Court addresses the issue early next year, their ultimate decision could affect elections in this country for years.

The Supreme Court said on Tuesday it would rule on whether U.S. voters must show a government-issued photo identification at the polls, a divisive issue ahead of next year’s national elections.

The justices said they would review a U.S. appeals court ruling that upheld an Indiana law considered the most restrictive in the nation requiring voters to present a photo ID issued by the state or federal government, such as a driver’s license or a passport.

The 2005 law, which applies to both primary and general elections, has been challenged by lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union and the Indiana Democratic Party for imposing an unfair burden on the right to vote, especially on the elderly, poor, disabled or homeless.

We desperately need a uniform Voter ID system and one which not only proves who an individual is, but confirms their citizenship.

Until then, I fear almost every election held in this country will be challenged on some level as to its authenticity.

Written by Sue

One Response to “Will Voter ID be approved by order of the US Supreme Court?”


  1. ~J~ Says:


    Visit ~J~

    For the life of me I can’t understand why anyone would be opposed to making sure all votes are legal votes from legal voters.

    If money is allocated to take those who can’t drive to the Motor Vehicles offices around the country to get a free ID what is the hardship?

    Why are the Democrats and the ACLU so opposed to such an idea when they are the ones who always claim voter fraud in elections?:-??