Admin
Verse of the Day
The Newsroom
Recent Posts
- I Haven’t Deserted You
- Can You Relate?
- Tis Better To Give Than To Receive
- Commander-In-Chief
- Got A Minute?
Recent Comments
- Sue on I Haven’t Deserted You
- ~J~ on Can You Relate?
- ~J~ on Happy Thanksgiving
- Piano Girl on Does Our President Have to Go to Church to Prove He’s Christian?
- ~J~ on Does Our President Have to Go to Church to Prove He’s Christian?
- David M. on Does Our President Have to Go to Church to Prove He’s Christian?
- ~J~ on Those Wonderful Church Bulletin Bloopers
- David M. on Those Wonderful Church Bulletin Bloopers
- ~J~ on Bar-B-Que
- ~J~ on Taking The Charity Out Of The Church
Blogroll
Newspaper Rack
Categories
For those who followed the case of the Border Crossing Guards, Ramos and Compean, there is news today from the 5t Circuit Court of Appeals:
Federal prosecutors may have overreacted in their case against two Border Patrol agents who were sentenced to lengthy prison terms after jurors convicted them of shooting a fleeing drug suspect and hiding evidence of the incident, an appeals court judge said Monday.
Judge E. Grady Jolly, one of three judges from the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals hearing the case of Ignacio Ramos and Jose Alonso Compean, questioned whether the two agents would have been charged if they had reported the shooting.
“For some reason, this one got out of hand, it seems to me,” Jolly said of the agents’ prosecution.
A federal jury in Texas convicted Ramos and Compean of assault, obstruction of justice and civil rights violations in the wounding of Osvaldo Aldrete Davila on the Texas border near El Paso in 2005. A federal judge sentenced Compean to 12 years in prison and Ramos to 11 years.
The agents’ attorneys are asking the 5th Circuit to throw out the convictions. The judges didn’t indicate when they will rule on the appeals.
“It does seem to me like the government overreacted here,” Jolly said, noting the severity of the charges and the lengthy sentences prosecutors sought, as he questioned Assistant U.S. Attorney Mark Stelmach.
It will be interesting to follow these developments and hear if the 2 other presiding Judges have the same opinion as it seems Judge Jolly offered.
As the article points out, the court has set no timetable upon which to rule, but this one bears watching.
HT:Hot Air
Written by Sue



~J~ Says:
December 4th, 2007 at 10:27 amVisit ~J~
I hope these judges do the right thing and overturn their convictions and make them whole so they can get their jobs and their lives back.
If Johnny Sutton chooses to appeal in this instance then I hope it is reinforced by higher courts.
These men were just doing their jobs and don’t deserve what has happened to them.