J's Cafe Nette

Archive for the ‘Congressional B.S.’ Category

While growing up on an Indian reservation in Old Town, Maine, throughout the fifties and sixties, it was not unusual to see a shiny, black car with State Troopers driving it pulling up to our house and the distinguished gentleman inside get out and come to our door.

Other kids would ask what was going on and we would just tell them the governor was there. No big deal. Everyone has the governor come to their house, right? And our congressmen always go to your houses too, right?

Well, that’s what I thought. No big deal. It happens all the time. Sometimes I’d put my ear down at the keyhole in one of the living room doors that were now closed and see if I could hear any of the conversation by the “grown-ups” in that room. If I heard it didn’t interest me enough to remember it now.

These visits occurred shortly after our island reservation was finally connected to the mainland by a one-lane bridge. This bridge saved many lives. I vaguely remember when it was being built and I have at least one memory of riding to the mainland by the ferry operated by one of our fellow tribesmen.

The bridge saved many lives because many lives were lost when Indians on our reservation would attempt to cross the river to the mainland in the spring or just after the ice started forming on the river in the winter. The ice was there but wasn’t thick enough to safely walk on it—yet it was too thick to just paddle a boat or canoe through it. If anyone from our community wanted to cross to the mainland to shop, conduct business or just see a movie, he or she had to take a chance on the ice giving out while crossing in each direction, until the ice all melted in the Spring or froze solid in the Winter.

I come from a family of very strong women. Most of them had to be strong because they were either widowed or unmarried and had to support the family, including grandchildren, nieces, nephews and great-nieces and nephews. They gained respect in the “white community” enough for people to know they were trustworthy and good people who were firm in their convictions.

Many members of my family were instrumental in seeing to it that they lobbied the state legislators and the governor until we were finally able to convince the Republican leaders in Maine that we should be able to purchase a bridge with our own money so our people would be safer. It was our money but we had to put our hand out to the state because we were still considered “paupers” by the state and didn’t get the right to vote until the 1950’s. We were good enough to serve in the armed forces and die for our country, but we were paupers to the state and entitled to no rights.

It was through this lobbying effort, made possible by years of building a relationship with the lawmakers, that our family became acquaintances with the political leaders in our state. That’s why we saw them at our home. If they were in the area they stopped by and chewed the fat over politics, I suppose.

As hard as that struggle was, I think the struggle for the very soul of America is even harder. Last year at this time it seemed as though God had removed His blessing entirely from this country. And who could blame Him? We’ve kicked Him out of every facet of our public lives since Madeline Murray O’Hare got the Lord’s Prayer out of schools. How many of you remember reciting the Lord’s Prayer just before the Pledge of Allegiance in public school? Fortunately I was in high school before the prayer became forbidden and I did miss it when it was taken from us.

Last year I felt as though this country was headed for disaster that could never be repaired. Then came the tea party in April and another one in July, followed by the town halls held all over this country in August and September, followed by more peaceful demonstrations by grassroots Americans who just wanted what is best for our country. Each of these events made me get a glimmer of hope, and when I saw Sen. Arlen Specter getting torn to bits verbally by some of his constituents in Pa. I began to realize I wasn’t in the minority of opinion in this country anymore. They didn’t harm anything but Specter’s feelings, or any other senator’s or congressperson’s. It was the words they didn’t like and tried to tamp down, but the people would not have it.

We had gone through TARP, Stimulus, the House passing Cap and Trade, and watching Congress rush every large spending bill through without taking the time to study the consequences, while spending trillions of our dollars. No one really knew what was in the bills unless it was the staff of the Congresspeople or Senators. Yet they voted to pass these huge spending bills because they were “crises” and as Rahm Emanuel said, “We can’t afford to waste a good crisis.”

Now they were screwing around with our health care and we finally had had enough.

Since August the Congress has known we want no part of the current health bills passed by the House or Senate. We all agree it would be good to reform some things in our health care system, but we do not want the federal government stepping in and making a huge bill that will never be able to be fixed. We want it done incrementally and studiously, so we know our money is being spent responsibly. Many things such as the “undercover patients” mentioned by doctor and Senator Tom Coburn at Thursday’s pow-wow with Democrats will cost little, if anything at all. Of course it will cost something because Congress will create a separate department along with a bureaucracy for that purpose. Reforming our tort laws will cost nothing but the plaintiff’s attorneys’ support to the Democrats in government. No money lost to the taxpayer.

The point is not to create a massive bureaucracy in Washington, but to create a good bill with the least amount of disruption to our lives and the least amount of funds to do it properly. Slim government instead of bloated government. Surely we cannot address every problem in our health care system in one huge bill. Even a blind man can see that. Go in “baby steps” as Obama calls it.

Now the Democrats have decided they will take six weeks, ostensibly for the Republicans to give them “new ideas” and work out a bipartisan health care bill, or the Democrats will go to reconciliation if they cannot get the required 60 votes to pass a bill in the Senate.

I saw a headline at Politco.com awhile ago that says Democrats are “feeling out the next step” for the health care bill. This bill has had more lives than Morris the Cat, and like a fire you think is out, keeps coming back to bite you in the butt. Just when you thought it was safe, they go at it again.

Thursday’s “summit” was nothing but a group of grouchy, majority Democrats, barely hiding their contempt (if at all) at the Republicans who were at last invited to sit at the same table with them and discuss their ideas on health care reform. You know, the ideas the Democrats have claimed they didn’t have. They had some good ideas and came ready to discuss the legislation. Naturally, if you are going to discuss something that is in writing you are going to take the text to the meeting to reference it while speaking. At least that’s what Rep. Eric Cantor of Virginia thought. Obama put him straight, though, when he told Cantor he was bringing “props”. Cantor had actually marked pages to flip to so he could do his presentation, and when accused by Obama of bringing a prop for political purposes told Obama that he thought since they were discussing the Senate bill it was only appropriate to have said bill in their presence.

The Republicans brought their A team to the meeting, while the Democrats seemed as though they had decided to just go through the motions and didn’t bother to prepare to speak about the language. Instead, they seemed to have been in some sort of contest to see which one could come up with the saddest story about people who have to pay insurance premiums or who cannot afford insurance. The winner in this contest (at least in my mind) was the ridiculously off-topic statement by Rep. Louise Slaughter of NY, when she told of one of her constituents who was wearing her dead sister’s dentures because she couldn’t afford her own. I don’t know about anyone else, but dental health has nothing to do with health insurance policies. I have dental insurance which is separate from my health insurance. By her reasoning I guess we should get the government to pay for our life insurance, car insurance, homeowner’s insurance and renter’s insurance if you rent. It’s about as related to health care as dental insurance.

Try to go to an eye doctor to get a regular eye exam and try to pay for it with your Medicare. You can’t do it. I was at the eye doctor’s office in January to get my yearly diabetic exam (paid for by my health insurance after a $30 co-pay) and another lady came in to have her eyes examined and asked if Medicare would pay for it. When she was told no she just hauled out the check book and wrote a check, so I know for a fact it is not covered by Medicare. You can’t get an exam for your vision with health insurance either. For that you either use the eye care insurance and come back another day for the same exam, except they’ll refract your eyes, or you can pay the cost of the refraction separately and not fool with your eye care insurance if you do not wish to have the same eye exam twice in one week.

We hear Obama and the Democrats bemoan the fact that 30 million Americans (I guess they’re all legal citizens) do not have health insurance, but you never hear them mention the 280 million or so Americans who do have health care insurance, or can afford it but think they’re invincible so they don’t get it.

Why can’t we go back to the innocent days of my childhood when saying no meant no? Not now. Not ever. Pelosi, Reid and Obama do not recognize that word or the will of the people. Obama is willing to throw out his congressional majority for his legacy legislation, and Pelosi and Reid are gullible or power hungry enough to help him. Remember, his last words were something to the effect that they could pass the bill and if the people didn’t like it that’s why we have elections.

Ah, the days of my childhood….to be so innocent and trusting as I was then.

Tweet This Post

We all know the longest river in the world is Denial. It appears the Democrats are taking a trip down that river.

Mounting evidence that independent voters have soured on the Democrats is prompting a debate among party officials about what rhetorical and substantive changes are needed to halt the damage.

Following serious setbacks with independents in off-year elections earlier this month, White House officials attributed the defeats to local factors and said President Barack Obama sees no need to reposition his own image or the Democratic message.

Since then, however, a flurry of new polls makes clear that Democrats are facing deeper problems with independents—the swing voters who swung dramatically toward the party in 2006 and 2008 but who now are registering deep unease with the amount of spending and debt called for under Obama’s agenda in an era of one-party rule in Washington.

A Gallup Poll released last week offered a disturbing glimpse about the state of play: just 14 percent of independents approve of the job Congress is doing, the lowest figure all year. In just the past few days alone, surveys have shown Democratic incumbents trailing Republicans among independent voters by double-digit margins in competitive statewide contests in places as varied as Connecticut, Ohio and Iowa.

[All emphasis mine~Admin~]

The quoted article goes on to say there is a “real problem of messaging” for the Democrats.

The problem isn’t a problem of messaging so much as what the message is. We have a man in the Oval Office who has traveled more than any other president at this point of his term. He is more focused on having the world love him than he is on governing this country he ran for four years to govern.

It’s not a problem of messaging with health care, when we all know the message. Pass a bill, any bill, and make sure it has universal health care with penalties for not participating, cuts in Medicare for the elderly to the point some hospitals and doctors will refuse to treat Medicare patients if this terrible bill becomes law. And don’t forget the extra taxes it will take to fund this monstrosity that was dreamed up in Nancy Pelosi’s office with no bi-partisan participation requested or wanted.

First it was TARP and, yes, President Bush took the heat for that one in order to protect Obama from having to do so. What have we received for all those billions (or is it trillions) of dollars spent on that program? We bought GM and run Chrysler, we infused money into banks that gave loans to foreign companies instead of small businesses from the United States, the government thinks it has the right to dictate salaries to every executive in every company whether or not it received TARP funds and on and on.

Next was a stimulus bill that put an even heavier weight on the taxpayers of this country so unemployment wouldn’t go higher than 8%. Unemployment is now at 10.2%, the highest it has been in 26 years and there is still no end in sight. That’s just the national average. In some states it’s approaching 20%.

We were promised this stimulus would create or save millions of jobs, only to find out in reporting out Tuesday that some people claiming new or saved jobs live in congressional districts that don’t exist. For example, someone has touted the jobs saved or created in Arizona’s 18th Congressional District, Connecticut’s 86th District and Puerto Rico’s 99th District. Going by these stats it would appear Puerto Rico is our biggest “state”. The problem is that none of these states have that many Congressional Districts. Arizona has 8 and not 18. Connecticut has 5 and not 86. Puerto Rico probably has one. And on and on it goes.

It goes without saying that if the government can be so easily fooled on such an easy topic to investigate they have no business putting the bureaucrats in charge of our health care.

The House passed a cap and trade bill and Sen. Barbara Boxer rammed it through her committee without one Republican present, as they were (rightfully) waiting for an analysis from the EPA. I doubt this bill will pass, but if it does you can watch your electric bills skyrocket as soon as it’s signed. And of course, there will be more taxes.

The Bush tax cuts are set to expire next year (thank you, Olympia Snowe) and there is no sign the Democratic Congress will extend or make them permanent. No way, because they need every cent in your pocket and everything the Chinese can lend us to implement their programs.

The big elephant in the room is the Health Care legislation making its way through Congress. The House already passed a bill that is an abomination and promised to insert language that is already the law of the land: no public funding for abortions used as birth control. Pelosi did this so she could get the moderate pro-life Democrats to vote to pass the bill, with the intention of removing it in conference. And the liberal women in the House are screaming to get this out of the bill.

We know this monstrosity of a bill will cost over 1 trillion dollars but we don’t know exactly how much more.

Obama says we can keep our health care but in five years we will be required to pick another, government plan. They don’t publicize that at all. Premiums will go up and care will go down.

Can you imagine seeing a scene in a prison where a guy asks what the others are in for? The first guy says “murder”, the second guy says “rape” and the third guy says “I didn’t buy health insurance”. This is in the bill. You can get a quarter of a million dollar fine and/or five years in prison for not participating in this plan.

But these are all side issues, which have just contributed to the independents’ anger at the Democrats. The real issue at the top of everyone’s list is the economy and the lack of good-paying jobs. Jobs that will support a family.

I was at the beauty shop Tuesday and my hair dresser was telling me she can’t afford to raise prices even though the price for her to work there is increasing. Customers and other hair dressers, including her, have husbands who are now out of work and don’t know when they will get a job.

As she said, unemployment is better than nothing, but they’d rather be working.

We’re not big on giving large expensive gifts for Christmas. We give to our grandchildren and our children, but this year we are going to cut back on the adults. We won’t disappoint the children, but we won’t be giving as much to our children and their spouses.

Bill Clinton had a sign up in his war room during his first run for the presidency. It was simple and to the point: “It’s the economy, stupid!” To which I tell Obama: “It’s still the economy, stupid!”

Tweet This Post

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: October 7, 2009

Spratt Statement on New Deficit Estimate

WASHINGTON, D.C. – House Budget Committee Chairman John Spratt issued the following statement on the new deficit estimate released today by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).

“It should be remembered that fiscal year 2009 began during the Bush Administration, which left in its wake the worst recession since the 1930s, including a sharp plunge in revenues. As a result, a large part of the 2009 deficit results from policies undertaken by the Bush Administration, including the cost of the TARP. Much of the rest stems from the cost of efforts like the Recovery Act, which was necessary to keep a faltering economy from becoming an economic meltdown.
[my emphasis--Admin]

“It is counterproductive to balance the budget when the economy is in recession. But today’s figures send us the latest alarm. As the economy stabilizes and starts to recover, we will have to turn our focus back to deficit reduction.”
###
More Information: Budget Home | YouTube | Facebook
207 Cannon Building, Washington D.C. 20515 | (202) 226-7200

I got this piece of crap in my email tonight.

I guess Bush was responsible for everything that ever went wrong in this country from the time the Pilgrims landed on Plymouth Rock.

I don’t know about the rest of you, but I’m sick of this penny ante political statements meant to glorify one party that couldn’t correctly lead a group to the bathroom.

Don’t you wish your Congressman was the chairman of the budget committee so he could tell you it’s impossible to balance the budget in a recession? Yeah, sure it is if you’re a Democrat and passed the bills that created the recession and don’t forget: the One voted for the TARP plan when he was still a Senator.

Tweet This Post